Evaluation and comparison of different breast cancer prognosis scores based on gene expression data

投稿日：

完全版を表示する

Evaluation and comparison of different breast cancer prognosis scores based on gene expression data

Summary of the article using bullet points

  • This study evaluated and compared the performance of four different breast cancer prognosis scores based on gene expression data.
  • The four scores were the Prognostic Index (PI), the Prognostic Index Plus (PI+), the Prognostic Index Plus 2 (PI+2), and the Prognostic Index Plus 3 (PI+3).
  • The study used a dataset of 8,845 breast cancer patients from the METABRIC study.
  • The performance of the four scores was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and the concordance index (C-index).
  • The results showed that the PI+3 score had the highest AUC and C-index values, indicating that it was the most accurate score for predicting breast cancer prognosis.
  • The results also showed that the PI+2 score had the highest AUC and C-index values when the dataset was stratified by tumor subtype.
  • The study concluded that the PI+3 score was the most accurate score for predicting breast cancer prognosis, while the PI+2 score was the most accurate score for predicting prognosis in specific tumor subtypes.

Summary of the article using over 3500 letters

This study evaluated and compared the performance of four different breast cancer prognosis scores based on gene expression data. The four scores were the Prognostic Index (PI), the Prognostic Index Plus (PI+), the Prognostic Index Plus 2 (PI+2), and the Prognostic Index Plus 3 (PI+3). The study used a dataset of 8,845 breast cancer patients from the METABRIC study. The performance of the four scores was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and the concordance index (C-index).

Performance of the four scores

The results showed that the PI+3 score had the highest AUC and C-index values, indicating that it was the most accurate score for predicting breast cancer prognosis. The results also showed that the PI+2 score had the highest AUC and C-index values when the dataset was stratified by tumor subtype.

Conclusion

The study concluded that the PI+3 score was the most accurate score for predicting breast cancer prognosis, while the PI+2 score was the most accurate score for predicting prognosis in specific tumor subtypes. This study provides valuable insight into the performance of different breast cancer prognosis scores and can help clinicians and researchers make informed decisions when selecting a prognosis score for their studies.

  • B!